The California Land-Falling Jets Experiment
Goals and Experimental Design
25 September 1997

F. M. Ralph, NOAA/ERL/Environmental Technology Laboratory
325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80303 (303-497-7099, 303-497-6978 fax,

1. Motivation

Land falling cyclones cause extensive damage along the US west coast by producing >8 inches of rain in 24 h (e.g., 1/10/95, 3/10/95, 11/20/96, and 1/1/97), and >50 m/s surface winds (e.g., 12/11/95 and 11/20/96) as they come ashore. Although accurate warnings of these events are needed to alert the public, military, and emergency services, the timing is often off by several hours and the location by 300 km along shore. Rhea (1996) showed that 6-h QPF from the NWS California and Nevada River Forecast Center for 2 heavy precipitation periods had a significantly lower correlation with observed precipitation than did 24-h QPF. The need for improvements in this type of forecast is reflected in the objectives of the National Weather Service and the USWRP. These views are also supported by recommendations of operational weather forecasters from NOAA and the military, and from river forecasters, that short-range forecasts (0-6 h) of mesoscale winds and precipitation are critical forecast problems along the United States west coast for which improvements are needed.

A key player involved in creating this severe weather is the prefrontal low-level jet (LLJ), within extratropical cyclones. This jet often contains much moisture, and can cause extreme coastal rains when it encounters mountains (e.g., Smith 1979; Banta 1990). Damaging coastal winds can be created either by low-level blocking, or by mountain wave behavior.

Operational forecasters have long used the LLJ's strength, position, and moisture content to help predict precipitation rates and coastal winds. Because significant errors in these key parameters are possible due to the limited amount of data available offshore and aloft along the coast, it appears that improved observations of the LLJ could improve forecasts. Adjoint techniques have also been used to identify limited regions where additional data could help forecasts downstream (e.g., Pailleux 1990; Rabier et al. 1994; Langland et al. 1995; Bao and Bresch 1996; Stensrud et al. 1996). These approaches suggest that improved knowledge of the position, and strength of the LLJ offshore, 0-18 h before landfall could allow mesoscale numerical models to better predict the location and intensity of flooding rains and damaging winds. Predictions of the overall motion and development of the entire cyclone will also affect the location and timing of the heavy rains, and because the LLJ is a key player in the self-development process in cyclogenesis through thermal advections, better observations of the LLJ could also improve the overall cyclone prediction (Langland et al. 1995).

2. Primary goals

The experiment focuses on improving prediction and understanding of key mesoscale phenomena in the coastal zone of the western United States related to the land fall of the LLJ in winter storms. Data will be gathered offshore up to 12 h before land fall, and along shore during land fall. The specific goals are as follows:

  • Assess how sensitive mesoscale numerical predictions of flooding rains and windstorms along the coast are to uncertainty in the strength, position, and moisture content of the LLJ 0-18 h before its land fall?
  • Assess how observations from an array of coastal wind profilers or a few buoy-mounted or island wind profilers offshore improve short-term (0-12 h) quantitative precipitation forecasts of flooding rains and damaging coastal winds?

  • Provide offshore and coastal observations from the experiment to operational weather forecasters to help them provide more accurate warnings to the public.

  • Determine what atmospheric conditions contribute to the gross underestimates of rainfall from NEXRAD in coastal mountains?

  • Provide unique observations of conditions at land fall for comparison with mesoscale numerical simulations. These include detailed measurements of boundary layer conditions offshore and onshore, as well as microphysical measurements relating to orographic precipitation enhancement.

3. Relationship to U.S. Weather Research Program and U.S. National Weather Service scientific objectives

CALJET addresses two of the three initial scientific foci of the U.S. Weather Research Program (Emanuel et al. 1995, Dabbert et al. 1996), which encourage studies related to:

  • quantitative precipitation forecasting, and
  • the importance and mix of observations in numerical weather prediction.

Similarly, CALJET addresses two of the major priorities set within the National Weather Service aimed at improving operational weather forecasts (Uccellini 1996). Within the Office of Meteorology's 10-y Strategic Plan it is recommended that "The NWS science priorities include studies of processes involved with

  • quantitative precipitation forecasting, and
  • effects of topography on local weather regimes."

CALJET also directly addresses two major NOAA programs regarding the importance and mix of observations: the North American Observing System (NAOS), and Pacific Coastal Forecast System (Pac-CFS) programs. Pac-CFS has deployed dozens of drifting buoys off the U.S. west coast, and has supported the deployment and testing of a profiler on the Farallon Islands west of San Francisco that will be included in our research.

It has also been noted by the USWRP (Dabbert et al. 1996) that advances in both observational techniques and numerical simulations have created a unique opportunity to improve weather forecast accuracy through integrated studies of physical processes, predictability, and observing system capabilities. This conclusion was found to be especially relevant to the subjects of coastal meteorology and mountain weather (Rotunno et al. 1996; Smith et al. 1996).

4. Relationship to the COAST and FASTEX experiments

Two experiments on cyclones help provide the experience needed to carry out CALJET:

  • Coastal Observation And Simulation with Topography (COAST) in 1993 and 1995, and
  • Fronts and Atlantic Storm Tracks Experiment (FASTEX) in 1997.

COAST explored the modification of mesoscale structures by coastal mountains in land falling extratropical cyclones in the Pacific Northwest using the P-3 (Bond et al. 1996). The experiment successfully measured the land falling phase of several cyclones, focusing mostly on the modification of fronts, and the distribution of precipitation and microphysical conditions related to orographic precipitation enhancement. Although COAST contained a significant mesoscale modeling component, and the P-3 provided invaluable data along and on shore, little data was gathered far enough offshore to aid in initializing the models (Colle and Mass 1996).

FASTEX aimed at improving understanding and prediction of secondary cyclogenesis in the North Atlantic (Joly et al. 1995), and used the P-3 and other research aircraft. Observations of both the precursors to the storms and the storms themselves were made. A key objective was to test the use of adaptive observing strategies in improving 24-48 h weather predictions. This approach was based on techniques that have shown strong sensitivity of the cyclone forecasts to a few observations from within a limited domain marking a dynamically sensitive part of the flow (e.g., Pailleux 1990, and Rabier et al. 1994). The data from several research aircraft and their dropsondes were incorporated directly into real-time numerical weather predictions.

CALJET will capitalize on these techniques, i.e., targeting (FASTEX) of the LLJ 0-18 h before land fall, and documenting the land falling phase of the LLJ for use in verifying the mesoscale simulations (COAST). Because CALJET is sharply focused on the LLJ it is possible to carry out the planned objectives without the much larger facilities required for FASTEX.

5. Experimental design

CALJET will take place from 1 December 1997 to 31 March 1998, when numerous wind profilers and a cloud radar will be in place along the coast. A special observing period will focus on 18 January to 28 February 1998, when NOAA's P-3 and the Univ. of Oklahoma's Doppler on Wheels will be operated out of Monterey, California. A weather briefing will be presented each day at the Naval Postgraduate School. The dates of the experiment correspond to the time of maximum monthly averaged precipitation along the California coast (Fig. 1), which peaks in early January in northern California, and in early February in central California. The experiment incorporates both numerical modeling and observations.

a) Observations

CALJET will make use of a wide variety of special observing systems to augment the existing operational network. The special observations, which are shown in Fig. 2 and listed in Appendix 1, will include additional offshore data from the NOAA P-3 (GPS dropsondes, dual-Doppler-capable tail radar, gust probe, C-SCAT, etc...), drifting buoys, and three island-mounted

Fig. 1. Climatology of precipitation at sites in northern (Eureka), central (San Francisco), and southern (Santa Barbara) California. The data are derived from the California Water Supply Outlook, and represent 30-day average rainfall over 70 y. Precipitation (inches) and central dates (mm/dd) of each 30-d average are marked.

wind profilers. The coastal network will be enhanced, ultimately including 20 wind profilers with RASS (mostly boundary layer profilers continuously measuring winds from 0.3 to 3 km AGL, and virtual temperature from 0.3 to 1.0 km AGL). GPS dropsonde data from the P-3 will be sent hourly via satellite for use in nowcasting and numerical modeling. Profiler and RASS data will be sent to NCEP via NOAA's Forecast Systems Laboratory using procedures recently established for providing boundary layer profiler data from dozens of sites around the country to NCEP for possible use in operational numerical weather prediction. The drifting buoys will report via the ARGOS satellite roughly 4 times per day. Operational surface and sounding networks and satellite-derived sea surface winds and cloud-tracked winds will be included.

i) Three special observing areas (SOA) will be created along the coast.

  • SOA-1, the microphysics area near Santa Rosa, CA, will include a vertically pointing 3-cm radar, airsondes, and two or three wind profilers (possibly including one on the Farallon Islands), along a southwest-northeast line crossing the coastal mountains. These will measure the cross-coast variation of wind, temperature, and hydrometeors in a region where orography greatly modulates precipitation (the coastal mountain area received 83" of rain last year, while a site just 25 km further northeast received only 43").
  • SOA-2, the Doppler on Wheels area, will be centered on the two mobile radars (typically 50 km apart along the coast) that can range between Santa Barbara and Crescent City, CA. A mobile, radar-tracked airsonde balloon launching system will accompany the DOW. This will focus on the area of heaviest rainfall during land fall. SOA-2 enhances the documentation of conditions at land fall for assessing the value of the offshore data. Detailed mapping of the LLJ up to100 km offshore and 200 km along shore is possible.
  • SOA-3, the California Bight area, will be instrumented with 10 wind profilers (including 5 that are permanently in place plus 2 on islands) to diagnose the influence of the complex terrain on the precipitation distribution, LLJ behavior, and damaging winds in this heavily populated region of approximately 17 million people.

Fig. 2. A map of CALJET's coastal domain showing key observing systems deployed for the experiment. Coastal and drifting buoys are not shown. Topography is shown by shading: light gray is 0.3 - 1.0 km MSL, and dark gray is >1.0 km MSL.

ii) The P-3 "Pre-land fall" flight strategy (Fig. 3a):

As storms approach the California and Oregon coasts, potential IOPs will be identified based on both operational and mesoscale experimental model guidance, as well as satellite (cloud, water vapor, surface winds, and cloud-tracked winds) and buoy observations. If the available evidence suggests that a LLJ maximum associated with a cyclone, or with secondary waves on the polar front is approaching the California or Oregon coasts, an IOP will be called. It will be necessary to make this decision roughly 12-24 h before the flight would begin, i.e., 24-36 h before the LLJ makes land fall. This decision will be aided by quasi-operational 36-h mesoscale simulations from the Naval Research Laboratory's Coupled Ocean/Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS; Hodur 1997) and the Penn State/NCAR MM5 (Grell et al. 1994) using 12-36-km grid sizes. These simulations will be initialized with operational global-scale models, and experimental data such as from the P-3, drifting buoys, satellite image-tracked winds (Veldon et al. 1997), and profilers when possible. These runs should be completed by 9 AM PDT each day, which is 1 h before CALJET's daily weather briefing. Predictions from both the operational and experimental models would likely be improved through cooperation with the E-PAC experiment that is being designed to explore targeted observing for 48-72 h forecasts using dropsonde data from two C-130 aircraft over the eastern Pacific ocean for two weeks sometime during late January or February 1998.

CALJET's P-3 flights will target the LLJ and its environs roughly 1000 km offshore (Fig. 3a). Dropsondes will be deployed over a wide enough area to include not only the LLJ, but also features that contribute to the LLJ and its evolution on the mesoscale. These include the cold pool behind the surface cold front, the region ahead of the LLJ, and the warm front. After close examination of the operational and experimental data before take off, the P-3's radar, in-situ, dropsonde, and C-SCAT (surface winds beneath the aircraft) data will help guide the flight. A typical flight will initially emphasize 400 mb flight legs crossing the warm front, the warm sector, the LLJ, and the cold front. This provides a mapping for later low-level flight legs, and gives the most warning to operational forecasters based on transmission of the dropsonde data via satellite. The low-level flight legs emphasize radar and in-situ data gathering to precisely measure the LLJ jet position, strength, and moisture content, as well as the boundary layer.

Fig. 3. a) Schematic description of P-3 observing strategy for the pre-land fall phase of the experiment. The pre-cold frontal LLJ and frontal positions shown are loosely based on analysis of a storm on 6-7 January 1995 (Doyle 1997) and approximate the meteorological scales and structures involved. The one-way ferry time of the P-3 at 400 mb from Monterey is shown (light dashed). Total flight time is 10 h. b) The observing strategy for the land falling phase. The coast and coastal mountains (~0.8 km tall), the Doppler on Wheels (radar dishes), wind profilers (solid dots), a vertically pointing 3-cm radar (+) and a GPS integrated water vapor sensor (open box) are shown. A cold frontal rain band offshore and the region of orographic precipitation enhancement are shown with rain rate contours of 2 and 10 (shaded) mm h-1. The 100 km range ring (light dashed) of each DOW is marked (light dashed).

iii) Observing strategy for the land falling phase (Fig. 3b):

If the pre-land fall flight is close enough to shore that some ferry time can be saved, and the LLJ is already making land fall, then the P-3 could also observe conditions at land fall at the end of the flight. This would require 2-4 h after working farther offshore with the pre-land fall flight strategy. Another scenario would consist of a pre-land fall flight in a slower-moving storm, followed by a coastal flight after the required 16 h of down time for the P-3 crew.

This logistical limitation of the experimental design is partially overcome by the deployment of the two DOW radars and a mobile sounding system along the coast. These tools could be deployed roughly 12 h before land fall, and could respond rapidly to changing conditions or errors in the forecast position of heavy precipitation by moving north or south along the coast. [In the event of severe flooding the coastal roads may be blocked, but several routes exist across the coastal mountains that could allow these tools to continue documenting the event.] In an ideal case the deployments will capture the passage of the heavy precipitation across the microphysical observing area (SOA-1). This is shown in Fig. 3b, where the P-3 is used to first measure conditions well upstream of the coast, and then to perform stacked flight legs across the mountain to measure microphysical conditions, and finally to measure these conditions along shore just a few kilometers offshore. This last objective would also provide turbulence and flux measurements in the boundary layer just offshore. The boundary layer and turbulence measurements are motivated by the fact that surface moisture fluxes contribute to the moisture cycle. Also, recent research has shown the impact of differential surface friction between land and sea versus topographic effects (Doyle and Warner 1993; Doyle 1997), and the sensitivity of cyclones to surface fluxes and boundary layer parameterizations is well known (Kuo et al. 1991; Persson et al. 1995; Doyle 1995).

b) Numerical modeling

i) Pre-experiment simulations to help guide the design of CALJET's observing strategies

The use of variational methods in numerical modeling has grown significantly in the last decade. Varational methods, such as the adjoint technique, have been developed for data assimilation (e.g., Lewis and Derber 1985), model sensitivity (e.g., Errico and Vukicevic 1992), and model tuning (e.g., Derber 1989). Of direct relation to the proposed work is the application of the dry version of an adjoint of a tangent-linear model developed by Errico et al. (1994) as part of the Mesoscale Adjoint Modeling System (MAMS). The dry version of the MAMS nonlinear model is based on the model designated MM4 developed jointly at the Pennsylvania State University and NCAR (Anthes et al. 1987). This adjoint has been used to study model sensitivities to initial/boundary conditions (e.g., Errico and Vukicevic 1992) and model parameters (e.g., Bao and Errico 1997) in which the sensitivity of a defined functional of model state at some point in time and space with respect to perturbations of model state and parameters at earlier times in the model simulation. Errico and Vukicevic (1992) show that the tangent-linear model accurately produces the evolution of perturbations in comparison with the full nonlinear version of the model. Therefore, the use of the adjoint of the tangent-linear model prior to the development of heavy precipitation event should provide useful and interesting results about the model sensitivity to various initial condition perturbations.

Working Hypothesis:

We assume that the development of heavy rainfall is the dominant, energetically active mode in the model simulation. We alter this mode as guided by the adjoint sensitivity analysis and our understanding of how heavy rainfall processes evolve both in reality and in the model framework. Therefore, the technique that we use for identifying the sensitivity area in the initial condition is based upon the following hypothesis: By modifying the initial condition based upon the adjoint sensitivity analysis with respect to known mesoscale flow structure that influences heavy rainfall development (e.g., low-level jet, model resolvable-scale vertical motion, inversion strength, and low-level temperature), such that the atmosphere near the region of heavy rainfall development in both space and time is altered, the model predictability can be improved.


A control simulation of California's New Years Day storm of 1997 will be performed using the full physics version of the Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model. We will then produce simulations from the same initial condition with the dry version of the model. It is expected that the differences between the dry version and the full physics version will be small before the onset of heavy rainfall. The dry version of the MAMS adjoint model can then be used to determine the sensitivity of the nonlinear model output to changes in the initial conditions. In particular, we use the adjoint model to guide us in altering the initial condition in such a way as to change the model atmosphere near the initial region of heavy rainfall development, while raining within the error characteristics of the observations. The altered initial condition is expected to provide better predictability of mesoscale flow structure that is crucial to the heavy rainfall development in the model. In this approach, we use the adjoint technique to selectively change the model initial state to produce the greatest influence on the subsequent development of heavy rainfall.

In addition, the MM5 adjoint will also be employed to explore the sensitivity of conditions at land fall to conditions offshore 12 h earlier. This is illustrated in Fig. 4, which shows that the vertical vorticity associated with the LLJ at the time of its land fall near 0000 UTC 1 January 1997 was sensitive to errors in the zonal (u) wind component at = 0.925 roughly 300 to 1200 km to the south and southwest 12 h earlier. This region is well within the range of the P-3, and its western portion corresponds to the LLJ.

Fig. 4. The sensitivity of the vertical vorticity at the center of the domain (dot) at the lowest level at 0000 UTC 1 January 1997 with respect to the u component of the wind at = 0.925 at the initial time (1200 UTC 31 December 1996). Contour interval is 5 units [1 unit = 1.4 x 10-6 s-1/(m s-1)]. Figure courtesy of J.-W. Bao and J. M. Wilczak.
ii) Real-time mesoscale modeling

Special real-time simulations of MM5 and COAMPS out to 36 h will be performed. They will be based on large-scale analyzed fields from NCEP's or the Navy's operational global-scale models, but we will attempt to incorporate as much of the available experimental data as possible: i.e., from drifting buoys, profilers, special soundings, the P-3's dropsondes, and cloud-tracked winds. These simulations serve two major purposes: 1) to provide additional guidance to the operational weather forecasters responsible for issuing warnings to the public about approaching storms, and 2) to help guide the deployment of the P-3, Doppler on Wheels and special soundings. These mesoscale simulations will use nested domains with roughly 36 km and 12 km grid sizes. It may be possible to use MM5 to simulate the larger meso--scale domain (up to 2000 km offshore) with courser grids, and to use COAMPS to focus on the meso--scale conditions at landfall using finer grids.

iii) Post-experiment sensitivity studies

After the experiment these models will be used to explore several research topics that CALJET will make possible, including the value of offshore data in mesoscale data assimilation, the behavior of the LLJ at landfall, the role of warm rain processes in this region during heavy precipitation events, and to assess the accuracy of the boundary layer and moisture cycles in the models.

6. Summary

The CALJET experiment will use the NOAA P-3, tropospheric wind profilers, the University of Oklahoma's Doppler on Wheels, and drifting buoys to measure conditions along and off the California and Oregon coasts during the 1997/98 winter. The goals are to improve quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPF) in land-falling winter storms, and to better understand the underlying physical processes and how they are represented in mesoscale numerical models.

The LLJ is a major focus for damaging weather when oceanic winter storms make land fall. Uncertainty in its position, strength, and moisture content just 12 h before land fall contributes to errors in mesoscale QPF. This view is supported by the MM5 adjoint analysis of a strong case from 1997, which also showed that the range of the P-3 is adequate to capture a major event 12 h before land fall (Fig. 4) using the planned pre-land fall flight strategy (Fig. 3a). The data from CALJET's pre-land fall flights will help assess the potential value of such offshore data. If the conclusion is that such data is of value, it would provide motivation to further improve affordable unattended aircraft and buoy-mounted wind profiler technologies that already show some promise. Another unique aspect of CALJET is that we intend for the P-3 dropsonde data to be transmitted nearly real time for direct use by operational weather forecasters. Also, the data will be ingested into mesoscale research numerical models (COAMPS and MM5) in a way that should provide improved short-term model guidance to forecasters. These have the potential to improve operational warnings to the public 0-18 h before the land fall of winter storms during the experiment. In post analysis these data will greatly improve our ability to measure the usefulness of offshore vertical profile data in testing future operational observing system options. The array of 20 coastal wind profilers represents the most extensive coastal deployment of wind profilers with RASS to date, and provides valuable real-time data concerning the position and intensity of the land falling LLJ and other features. As

Fig. 5. a) Composite El Nino index showing the strongest El Ninos of this century. Current conditions are shown for comparison. (From NOAA's Climate Diagnostics Center, b) Correlation between warm SST anomalies in the equatorial Pacific ocean and precipitation in the Continental United States in Jan/Feb/Mar. Contour interval is 10 mm, no zero contour is shown, and negative contours are dashed. Light and dark shading represent areas of statistically significant correlations. (From Livezey et al. 1997). The star marks CALJET's operations center and the center of its coastal observing domain.

pointed out from a study using 13 radiosonde sites along the U.S. west coast during STORMFEST (Hirschberg et al. 1995), such dense and frequent data captured more information on energy fluxes across the coast than the standard operational network, and thus would likely benefit forecasts farther downstream. With its lesser height coverage (1-4 km versus 15 km), but more frequent (1 h versus 6 h) profiles, CALJET's profiler data could possibly improve the 0-72 h forecasts over the rest of the Continental U. S.

This experiment builds on the techniques and results of the COAST, and FASTEX experiments, but focuses more sharply on mesoscale prediction of coastal flooding rains and damaging winds. This focus reflects the current objectives of two major research agendas from the U.S. National Weather Service, and the U. S. Weather Research Program.

Evidence of a major El Nino in the equatorial Pacific is shown in Fig. 5a, based on a composite of several El Nino indices produced by NOAA's Climate Diagnostics Center ( It has long been suggested that this anomaly is correlated with wet winters in California. Some of this inference is based on the winter of 1982/83, which was both the wettest winter on record in much of California and the strongest El Nino of the century. This correlation has recently been established more firmly by Livezey et al. (1997), who found a statistically significant correlation between warm equatorial sea surface temperature anomalies in the Pacific and increased rainfall in California in January/February/March (Fig. 5b). In fact, the greatest precipitation anomaly is located well within the CALJET domain, almost precisely where the special microphysical observing area will be sited. However, recall that any particular realization of this phenomenon can differ substantially from its statistical norm. Nonetheless, the fact that the current El Nino is likely to be even stronger than the 1982/83 event, and the correlations found by Livezey et al. 1997) indicate that there is a greater than normal likelihood that this winter will produce many of the storms of the type CALJET is designed to study.


F. Martin Ralph (PI) NOAA/Environmental Technology Laboratory, Boulder, CO
David W. Reynolds NOAA/National Weather Service, Monterey, CA
P. Ola G. Persson NOAA/CIRES/Environmental Technology Lab, Boulder, CO
Paul Neiman NOAA/Environmental Technology Laboratory, Boulder, CO
David Jorgensen NOAA/Natioanl Severe Storms Laboratory, Boulder, CO
Wendell A. Nuss Naval Postgraduate School, Dept. of Meteorology, Monterey, CA
Jerome Schmidt Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA
Doug Miller Naval Postgraduate School, Dept. of Meteorology, Monterey, CA
Joshua Wurman University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
Alan Shapiro University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
David Kingsmill University of Nevada at Reno, Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV
Bradley F. Smull NOAA/NSSL/JISAO/Univ. of Washington, Seattle

Appendix 1: Special observing systems for CALJET

NOAA P-3 (endurance: 9-10 h,
range: 3700-5700 km,
speed: 110-145 m/s)
3-cm FAST scanning tail radar (dual Doppler),
C-SCAT (surface winds),
GPS dropsondes,
in situ with gust probe, etc...
Drifting buoys (endurance: 270 d) 30 deployed by NWS/Scripps
Wind profilers with RASS
and surface sensors
San Clemente Is. (915 MHz, ETL)
Catalina Is. (915 MHz, ETL)
Farallon Is., tentative (915 MHz without RASS, ETL)


Univ. of Okla. Doppler on Wheels two 3-cm scanning Doppler radars along coast
mobile with dual Doppler coverage (~50 km apart)
NOAA/ETL precipitation radar vertical-pointing 3-cm radar (low & high sensitivity modes)
Wind profilers with RASS
and surface sensors,
including tipping-bucket
rain gauges
Miramar NAS, near San Diego (915 MHz, air quality)
Tustin (915 MHz, ETL)
Ontario Airport (915 MHz, air quality)
Univ. of Southern Calif. (915 MHz, ETL)
Los Angeles Intl. Airport (915 MHz, air quality)
Simi Valley (915 MHz, air quality)
Goleta, near Santa Barbara (915 MHz, ETL)
Vandenberg AFB (449 MHz, National Profiler Network)
Point Piedras Blancas, near San Simeon (915 MHz, ETL)
Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey (915 MHz, Navy)
Bodega Bay (915 MHz, ETL)
Cazadero, near the Russian River (915 MHz, ETL)
Point Arena (915 MHz, ETL)
Eureka (915 MHz, ETL)
Crescent City (915 MHz, ETL)
Newport, Oregon (915 MHz, ETL)
Radar-tracked airsondes Mobile with Doppler on Wheels (only in IOPs, 6-hourly)
Theodolite-tracked airsondes Co-located with cloud radar (only in IOPs, 6-hourly)


Anthes, R.A., E.-Y. Hsie, and Y.-H. Kuo, 1987: Description of the Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale model version 4 (MM4). NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-282+STR, 66 pp.

Banta, R. M., 1990: The role of mountain flows in making clouds. Atmospheric Processes Over Complex Terrain, W. Blumen, Ed., Amer. Meteor. Soc., Boston, MA, 229-283.

Bond, N. A., C. F. Mass, B. F. Smull, R. A. Houze, M.-J. Yang, B. A. Colle, S. A. Braun, M. A. Shapiro, B. R. Colman, P. J. Neiman, J. E. Overland, W. D. Neff, and J. D. Doyle, 1996: The Coastal Observation and Simulation with Topography (COAST) experiment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., (submitted).

Bao, J.-W., and R.M. Errico, 1997: An adjoint examination of a nudging method for data assimilation. Mon. Wea Rev., in press.

Colle, B. A., and C. F. Mass, 1996: An observational and modelling study of the interaction of low-level southwesterly flow with the Olympic Mountains during COAST IOP 4. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 2152-2175.

Dabbert, W. F., T. W. Schlatter, C. A Davis, R. J. Fleming, R. M. Hodur, G. J. Holland, S. E. Koch, S. J. Lord, W. D. Neff, R. A. Pielke Sr., L. J. Pietrafesa, D. Raymond, R. B. Smith, and D. S. Zrni, 1996: Research opportunities from emerging atmospheric observing and modeling capabilities: Report of the second prospectus development team of the U.S. Weather Research Program. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 305-323.

Derber, J.C, 1989: A variational continuous assimilation technique. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117, 2437-2446.

Doyle, J. D., and T. T. Warner, 1993: A three-dimensional numerical investigation of a Carolina coastal low-level jet during GALE IOP 2. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 1030-1047.

Doyle, J. D., 1995: Coupled ocean wave/atmosphere mesoscale model simulations of cyclogenesis. Tellus, 47A, 766-778.

Doyle, J. D., and M. A. Shapiro, 1996: Mesoscale characteristics of a topographically modulated frontal zone over Norway. Preprints, 7th Conf. on Meosocale Processes, 9-13 September, Reading, U.K., 319-321.

Emanuel, K., D. Raymond, A. Betts, L. Bosart, C. Bretherton, K. droegemeier, B. Farrell, J. M. Fritsch, R. Houze, M. Le Mone, D. Lilly, R. Rotunno, M. Shapiro, R. Smith, and A. Thorpe, 1995: Report of the first prospectus development team of the U.S. Weather Research Program to NOAA and the NSF. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 76, 1194-1208.

Errico, R.M., and T. Vukicevic, 1992: Sensitivity analysis using an adjoint of the PSU-NCAR

mesoscale model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120, 1644-1660.

Errico, R.M., K. Raeder and T. Vukicevic, 1994: Mesoscale adjoint modeling system: version 1. NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-410+IA, 224 pp.

Grell, G. A., J. Dudhia, and D. R. Stauffer, 1994: A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model (MM5). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-398+STR.

Hirschberg, P. A., R. J. Lind, S. J. Bolduc, and R. L. Elsberry, 1995: The west coast Picket fence experiment during STORMFEST. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 76, 1741-1757.

Hodur, R. M., 1997: The Naval Research Laboratory's Coupled Ocean/Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS). Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 1414-1430.

Joly, A., K. A. Browning, A. J. Thorpe, Y. Lemaitre, and J. P. Cammas, 1995: FASTEX: Outline of the field programme. Report available from FASTEX Project Office.

Kuo, Y.-H., R. J. Reed, and S. Low-Nam, 1991: Effects of surface energy fluxes during the early development and rapid intensification stages of seven explosive cyclones in the western Atlantic. Mon. Wea. Rev., 119, 457-476.

Langland , R. H., R. L. Elsberry, and R. M. Errico, 1995: Evaluation of physical processes in an idealized extratropical cyclone using adjoint sensitivity. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 121, 1349-1386.

Lewis, J.M., and J.C. Derber, 1985: The use of adjoint equations to solve a variational adjustment problem with advective constraints. Tellus, 37, 309-327.

Livezey, R. E., M. Masutani, A. Leetmaa, H. Rui, M. Ji, and A. Kumar, 1997: Teleconnective response of the Pacific-North American region atmosphere to large central equatorial Pacific SST anomalies. J. Climate, 10, 1787-1820.

Pailleux, J., 1990: The impact of North Atlantic TEMPSHIP radiosonde data on the ECMWF analysis and forecast. ECMWF Research Department Technical Memorandum No. 174, 36 pp.

Persson, P. O. G., J.-W. Bao, and S. D. Burk, 1995: Tests of the Burk-Thompson PBL scheme. Abstracts, Fifth PSU/NCAR Mesoscale Model Users Workshop, Aug.14-16, Boulder, CO.

Rabier, F., E. Klinker, P. Courtier, and A. Hollingswoth, 1994: Sensitivity of twoday forecast errors over the Northern Hemisphere to initial conditions. ECMWF Research Department Technical Memorandum No. 203, 38 pp.

Rhea, J. O., 1996: An objective orographically based QPF aid for California. National Weather Service Western Region Technical Attachment No. 96-02, 13 pp.

Rotunno, R., 1992: Coastal Meteorology. National Academy Press, 99 pp.

Rotunno, R., L. J. Pietrafesa, J. Allen, B. Coleman, C. Dorman, C. Krietzberg, S. Lord, M. McPhee, G. Mellor, C. Mooers, P. Niiler, R. Pielke Sr., M. Powell, D. Rogers, J. Smith, and L. Xie, 1996: Report of the third prospectus development team of the U.S. Weather Research program to NOAA and NSF. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., (in press).

Smith, R. B., 1979: The influence of the mountains on the atmosphere. Advances in Geophysics, B. Saltzman, Ed., Vol. 21, Academic Press, 87-230.

Smith, R. B., and co-authors, 1996: Research needs and opportunities in mountain meteorology: Report of the fourth prospectus development team of the U.S. Weather Research program to NOAA and NSF. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., (in press).

Stauffer, D. R., and N. L. Seaman, 1992: Use of four-dimensional data assimilation in a limited-area mesoscale model. Part I: Experiments with synoptic-scale data. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118, 1250-1277.

Uccellini, L. W., 1996: Office of Meteorology 1996-2005 Strategic Operating Plan. Available from the United States National Weather Service, Office of Meteorology, 75 pp.

Veldon, C. S., C. M. Hayden, S. J. Neiman, W. P. Menzel, S. Wanzong, and J. S. Goerss, 1997: Upper-tropospheric winds derived from geostationary satellite water vapor observations. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78, 173-195.

Commerce / NOAA / OAR / ERL / ETL / Meteorology / CALJET / Goals and Experimental Design